Constitutional Litigation
Across all forms of constitutional adjudication — unconstitutionality review, constitutional complaints, and competence disputes —
we provide expert legal services dedicated to the protection of fundamental rights.
Overview
Constitutional adjudication addresses the highest level of legal proceedings — determining whether statutes are unconstitutional, whether the exercise of public authority has violated fundamental rights, and resolving disputes over the powers of state institutions. Decisions of the Constitutional Court affect the entire legal system, and securing counsel with specialist expertise in this field is the decisive factor in achieving a favorable outcome.
PYEONG AN's constitutional litigation team includes a former Constitutional Court Justice and legal practitioners with deep expertise in Constitutional Court practice. We represent clients in all forms of constitutional adjudication: applications for referral of constitutionality review, constitutional complaints (rights-remedy type and constitutionality review type), and competence disputes.
Key Practice Areas
- Representation in applications for referral of constitutionality review
- Constitutional complaints (rights-remedy type)
- Constitutional complaints (constitutionality review type)
- Competence dispute adjudication
- Oral argument before the Constitutional Court
- Advisory on constitutionality of statutes and regulations